Review



camp response element binding protein creb1  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Proteintech camp response element binding protein creb1
    Camp Response Element Binding Protein Creb1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 237 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/camp response element binding protein creb1/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 237 article reviews
    camp response element binding protein creb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    Proteintech camp response element binding protein creb1
    Camp Response Element Binding Protein Creb1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/camp response element binding protein creb1/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    camp response element binding protein creb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Genechem small interfering rnas (sirnas) for camp-responsive element binding protein 1 (creb1), cebpα, and enpp2
    MiR-29a-3p regulates inflammation through <t>ENPP2;</t> ( A ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSCs treated by PBS, TAD, TAD (antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC; # P < 0.05 vs MSC TAD ; ( B ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSC-Exo treated by PBS, TAD, TAD(antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC-Exo; ## P < 0.01 vs MSC TAD- Exo; ( C ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in RAW264.7 treated by different MSC-Exo. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; ## P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( D – F ) ELISA for the expression of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6, TNFα, and IL-1β. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( G ) The protein expression of ENPP2 after treatment with different groups of exosomes. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; # P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( H ) One region in the enpp2 3’-UTR was predicted to bind with miR-29a-3p. ***P < 0.001 vs.NC (agomir)+ 3’-UTR-wt; ### P < 0.001 vs miR-29a-3p+3’-UTR-wt; ( I ) Proinflammatory factor protein expression in different treatments. ( A – I ) n = 3. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS+ MSC TAD -Exo; ### P < 0.001 vs LPS+MSC (agomir) -Exo.
    Small Interfering Rnas (Sirnas) For Camp Responsive Element Binding Protein 1 (Creb1), Cebpα, And Enpp2, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/small interfering rnas (sirnas) for camp-responsive element binding protein 1 (creb1), cebpα, and enpp2/product/Genechem
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    small interfering rnas (sirnas) for camp-responsive element binding protein 1 (creb1), cebpα, and enpp2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech anti rabbit camp response element binding protein
    MiR-29a-3p regulates inflammation through <t>ENPP2;</t> ( A ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSCs treated by PBS, TAD, TAD (antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC; # P < 0.05 vs MSC TAD ; ( B ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSC-Exo treated by PBS, TAD, TAD(antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC-Exo; ## P < 0.01 vs MSC TAD- Exo; ( C ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in RAW264.7 treated by different MSC-Exo. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; ## P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( D – F ) ELISA for the expression of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6, TNFα, and IL-1β. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( G ) The protein expression of ENPP2 after treatment with different groups of exosomes. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; # P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( H ) One region in the enpp2 3’-UTR was predicted to bind with miR-29a-3p. ***P < 0.001 vs.NC (agomir)+ 3’-UTR-wt; ### P < 0.001 vs miR-29a-3p+3’-UTR-wt; ( I ) Proinflammatory factor protein expression in different treatments. ( A – I ) n = 3. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS+ MSC TAD -Exo; ### P < 0.001 vs LPS+MSC (agomir) -Exo.
    Anti Rabbit Camp Response Element Binding Protein, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti rabbit camp response element binding protein/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rabbit camp response element binding protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    ABclonal Biotechnology camp-response element (cre)-binding protein(creb1
    MiR-29a-3p regulates inflammation through <t>ENPP2;</t> ( A ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSCs treated by PBS, TAD, TAD (antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC; # P < 0.05 vs MSC TAD ; ( B ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSC-Exo treated by PBS, TAD, TAD(antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC-Exo; ## P < 0.01 vs MSC TAD- Exo; ( C ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in RAW264.7 treated by different MSC-Exo. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; ## P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( D – F ) ELISA for the expression of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6, TNFα, and IL-1β. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( G ) The protein expression of ENPP2 after treatment with different groups of exosomes. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; # P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( H ) One region in the enpp2 3’-UTR was predicted to bind with miR-29a-3p. ***P < 0.001 vs.NC (agomir)+ 3’-UTR-wt; ### P < 0.001 vs miR-29a-3p+3’-UTR-wt; ( I ) Proinflammatory factor protein expression in different treatments. ( A – I ) n = 3. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS+ MSC TAD -Exo; ### P < 0.001 vs LPS+MSC (agomir) -Exo.
    Camp Response Element (Cre) Binding Protein(Creb1, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/camp-response element (cre)-binding protein(creb1/product/ABclonal Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    camp-response element (cre)-binding protein(creb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Abnova anti-camp response element binding protein 1 (creb1)
    MiR-29a-3p regulates inflammation through <t>ENPP2;</t> ( A ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSCs treated by PBS, TAD, TAD (antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC; # P < 0.05 vs MSC TAD ; ( B ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSC-Exo treated by PBS, TAD, TAD(antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC-Exo; ## P < 0.01 vs MSC TAD- Exo; ( C ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in RAW264.7 treated by different MSC-Exo. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; ## P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( D – F ) ELISA for the expression of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6, TNFα, and IL-1β. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( G ) The protein expression of ENPP2 after treatment with different groups of exosomes. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; # P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( H ) One region in the enpp2 3’-UTR was predicted to bind with miR-29a-3p. ***P < 0.001 vs.NC (agomir)+ 3’-UTR-wt; ### P < 0.001 vs miR-29a-3p+3’-UTR-wt; ( I ) Proinflammatory factor protein expression in different treatments. ( A – I ) n = 3. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS+ MSC TAD -Exo; ### P < 0.001 vs LPS+MSC (agomir) -Exo.
    Anti Camp Response Element Binding Protein 1 (Creb1), supplied by Abnova, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-camp response element binding protein 1 (creb1)/product/Abnova
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-camp response element binding protein 1 (creb1) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher silencer® sirna targeting camp response element-binding protein 1 (creb1)
    MiR-29a-3p regulates inflammation through <t>ENPP2;</t> ( A ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSCs treated by PBS, TAD, TAD (antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC; # P < 0.05 vs MSC TAD ; ( B ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSC-Exo treated by PBS, TAD, TAD(antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC-Exo; ## P < 0.01 vs MSC TAD- Exo; ( C ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in RAW264.7 treated by different MSC-Exo. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; ## P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( D – F ) ELISA for the expression of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6, TNFα, and IL-1β. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( G ) The protein expression of ENPP2 after treatment with different groups of exosomes. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; # P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( H ) One region in the enpp2 3’-UTR was predicted to bind with miR-29a-3p. ***P < 0.001 vs.NC (agomir)+ 3’-UTR-wt; ### P < 0.001 vs miR-29a-3p+3’-UTR-wt; ( I ) Proinflammatory factor protein expression in different treatments. ( A – I ) n = 3. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS+ MSC TAD -Exo; ### P < 0.001 vs LPS+MSC (agomir) -Exo.
    Silencer® Sirna Targeting Camp Response Element Binding Protein 1 (Creb1), supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/silencer® sirna targeting camp response element-binding protein 1 (creb1)/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    silencer® sirna targeting camp response element-binding protein 1 (creb1) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore camp responsive element binding protein 1(creb1
    Western blot analyses of NP cell lysates (25 µg of protein per lane) treated with vehicle (time 0) or with the PKCε-selective activator peptide ψεRACK (1μM) for 8, 18, or 40 hours show ( A ) ψεRACK-dependent increases in phosphorylation of PKCε (P-PKCε, left upper panel), and of the PKC-specific substrate MARCKS (P-MARCKS, right upper panel) (lower panels show PKCε and MARCKS abundance, respectively); ( B ) time course of PKCε-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which establishes a moderate and sustained ERK activation up to 40 hours (left upper panel) (lower panel shows ERK1/2 protein abundance), and of PKCε activation-dependent increases in expression of the transcription factor <t>CREB1</t> at 8 hours (right panel); ( C ) significant increases in expression of transcription factors Fos and ATF also at 8 hours after exposure to ψεRACK; equal loading for CREB1, Fos, and ATF was additionally monitored with immunodetection of p120GAP (right panel) on the upper part of the nitrocellulose membranes; ( D ) that ψεRACK-dependent ERK, CREB1, ATF and Fos activation was abolished by U0126 and PD98059, both inhibitors of MEK1/2, but not SB203580 (all inhibitors were added 20 min prior to treatments with ψεRACK). Similar results were obtained in five different NP cell lines; examples shown are from NP13 P8-P12 (A-C) and from NP11 P9-P13 (D).
    Camp Responsive Element Binding Protein 1(Creb1, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/camp responsive element binding protein 1(creb1/product/Millipore
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    camp responsive element binding protein 1(creb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc 7076 note creb1 camp responsive element binding protein 1
    Western blot analyses of NP cell lysates (25 µg of protein per lane) treated with vehicle (time 0) or with the PKCε-selective activator peptide ψεRACK (1μM) for 8, 18, or 40 hours show ( A ) ψεRACK-dependent increases in phosphorylation of PKCε (P-PKCε, left upper panel), and of the PKC-specific substrate MARCKS (P-MARCKS, right upper panel) (lower panels show PKCε and MARCKS abundance, respectively); ( B ) time course of PKCε-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which establishes a moderate and sustained ERK activation up to 40 hours (left upper panel) (lower panel shows ERK1/2 protein abundance), and of PKCε activation-dependent increases in expression of the transcription factor <t>CREB1</t> at 8 hours (right panel); ( C ) significant increases in expression of transcription factors Fos and ATF also at 8 hours after exposure to ψεRACK; equal loading for CREB1, Fos, and ATF was additionally monitored with immunodetection of p120GAP (right panel) on the upper part of the nitrocellulose membranes; ( D ) that ψεRACK-dependent ERK, CREB1, ATF and Fos activation was abolished by U0126 and PD98059, both inhibitors of MEK1/2, but not SB203580 (all inhibitors were added 20 min prior to treatments with ψεRACK). Similar results were obtained in five different NP cell lines; examples shown are from NP13 P8-P12 (A-C) and from NP11 P9-P13 (D).
    7076 Note Creb1 Camp Responsive Element Binding Protein 1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/7076 note creb1 camp responsive element binding protein 1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    7076 note creb1 camp responsive element binding protein 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Horng Gee Co Ltd camp-responsive-element-binding protein 1 (creb1) families
    Western blot analyses of NP cell lysates (25 µg of protein per lane) treated with vehicle (time 0) or with the PKCε-selective activator peptide ψεRACK (1μM) for 8, 18, or 40 hours show ( A ) ψεRACK-dependent increases in phosphorylation of PKCε (P-PKCε, left upper panel), and of the PKC-specific substrate MARCKS (P-MARCKS, right upper panel) (lower panels show PKCε and MARCKS abundance, respectively); ( B ) time course of PKCε-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which establishes a moderate and sustained ERK activation up to 40 hours (left upper panel) (lower panel shows ERK1/2 protein abundance), and of PKCε activation-dependent increases in expression of the transcription factor <t>CREB1</t> at 8 hours (right panel); ( C ) significant increases in expression of transcription factors Fos and ATF also at 8 hours after exposure to ψεRACK; equal loading for CREB1, Fos, and ATF was additionally monitored with immunodetection of p120GAP (right panel) on the upper part of the nitrocellulose membranes; ( D ) that ψεRACK-dependent ERK, CREB1, ATF and Fos activation was abolished by U0126 and PD98059, both inhibitors of MEK1/2, but not SB203580 (all inhibitors were added 20 min prior to treatments with ψεRACK). Similar results were obtained in five different NP cell lines; examples shown are from NP13 P8-P12 (A-C) and from NP11 P9-P13 (D).
    Camp Responsive Element Binding Protein 1 (Creb1) Families, supplied by Horng Gee Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/camp-responsive-element-binding protein 1 (creb1) families/product/Horng Gee Co Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    camp-responsive-element-binding protein 1 (creb1) families - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    MiR-29a-3p regulates inflammation through ENPP2; ( A ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSCs treated by PBS, TAD, TAD (antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC; # P < 0.05 vs MSC TAD ; ( B ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSC-Exo treated by PBS, TAD, TAD(antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC-Exo; ## P < 0.01 vs MSC TAD- Exo; ( C ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in RAW264.7 treated by different MSC-Exo. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; ## P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( D – F ) ELISA for the expression of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6, TNFα, and IL-1β. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( G ) The protein expression of ENPP2 after treatment with different groups of exosomes. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; # P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( H ) One region in the enpp2 3’-UTR was predicted to bind with miR-29a-3p. ***P < 0.001 vs.NC (agomir)+ 3’-UTR-wt; ### P < 0.001 vs miR-29a-3p+3’-UTR-wt; ( I ) Proinflammatory factor protein expression in different treatments. ( A – I ) n = 3. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS+ MSC TAD -Exo; ### P < 0.001 vs LPS+MSC (agomir) -Exo.

    Journal: International Journal of Nanomedicine

    Article Title: Tadalafil Enhances the Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomes in Pulmonary Hypertension by Upregulating miR-29a-3p

    doi: 10.2147/IJN.S493047

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MiR-29a-3p regulates inflammation through ENPP2; ( A ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSCs treated by PBS, TAD, TAD (antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC; # P < 0.05 vs MSC TAD ; ( B ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in MSC-Exo treated by PBS, TAD, TAD(antagomir), or agomir tested by RT-qPCR. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs MSC-Exo; ## P < 0.01 vs MSC TAD- Exo; ( C ) The expression values for miR-29a-3p in RAW264.7 treated by different MSC-Exo. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; ## P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( D – F ) ELISA for the expression of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6, TNFα, and IL-1β. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( G ) The protein expression of ENPP2 after treatment with different groups of exosomes. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs LPS; # P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC-Exo; ^ P < 0.05 vs LPS+MSC TAD -Exo; ( H ) One region in the enpp2 3’-UTR was predicted to bind with miR-29a-3p. ***P < 0.001 vs.NC (agomir)+ 3’-UTR-wt; ### P < 0.001 vs miR-29a-3p+3’-UTR-wt; ( I ) Proinflammatory factor protein expression in different treatments. ( A – I ) n = 3. ***P < 0.001 vs LPS+ MSC TAD -Exo; ### P < 0.001 vs LPS+MSC (agomir) -Exo.

    Article Snippet: China’s Genechem Co., Ltd. provided the small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) for cAMP-responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1), CEBPα, and Enpp2.

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Western blot analyses of NP cell lysates (25 µg of protein per lane) treated with vehicle (time 0) or with the PKCε-selective activator peptide ψεRACK (1μM) for 8, 18, or 40 hours show ( A ) ψεRACK-dependent increases in phosphorylation of PKCε (P-PKCε, left upper panel), and of the PKC-specific substrate MARCKS (P-MARCKS, right upper panel) (lower panels show PKCε and MARCKS abundance, respectively); ( B ) time course of PKCε-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which establishes a moderate and sustained ERK activation up to 40 hours (left upper panel) (lower panel shows ERK1/2 protein abundance), and of PKCε activation-dependent increases in expression of the transcription factor CREB1 at 8 hours (right panel); ( C ) significant increases in expression of transcription factors Fos and ATF also at 8 hours after exposure to ψεRACK; equal loading for CREB1, Fos, and ATF was additionally monitored with immunodetection of p120GAP (right panel) on the upper part of the nitrocellulose membranes; ( D ) that ψεRACK-dependent ERK, CREB1, ATF and Fos activation was abolished by U0126 and PD98059, both inhibitors of MEK1/2, but not SB203580 (all inhibitors were added 20 min prior to treatments with ψεRACK). Similar results were obtained in five different NP cell lines; examples shown are from NP13 P8-P12 (A-C) and from NP11 P9-P13 (D).

    Journal: PLoS ONE

    Article Title: PKCε Signalling Activates ERK1/2, and Regulates Aggrecan, ADAMTS5, and miR377 Gene Expression in Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082045

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Western blot analyses of NP cell lysates (25 µg of protein per lane) treated with vehicle (time 0) or with the PKCε-selective activator peptide ψεRACK (1μM) for 8, 18, or 40 hours show ( A ) ψεRACK-dependent increases in phosphorylation of PKCε (P-PKCε, left upper panel), and of the PKC-specific substrate MARCKS (P-MARCKS, right upper panel) (lower panels show PKCε and MARCKS abundance, respectively); ( B ) time course of PKCε-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which establishes a moderate and sustained ERK activation up to 40 hours (left upper panel) (lower panel shows ERK1/2 protein abundance), and of PKCε activation-dependent increases in expression of the transcription factor CREB1 at 8 hours (right panel); ( C ) significant increases in expression of transcription factors Fos and ATF also at 8 hours after exposure to ψεRACK; equal loading for CREB1, Fos, and ATF was additionally monitored with immunodetection of p120GAP (right panel) on the upper part of the nitrocellulose membranes; ( D ) that ψεRACK-dependent ERK, CREB1, ATF and Fos activation was abolished by U0126 and PD98059, both inhibitors of MEK1/2, but not SB203580 (all inhibitors were added 20 min prior to treatments with ψεRACK). Similar results were obtained in five different NP cell lines; examples shown are from NP13 P8-P12 (A-C) and from NP11 P9-P13 (D).

    Article Snippet: We used the following antibodies (and dilutions): polyclonal antibodies to tropomyocin (1:400) from Sigma, to phosphorylated species of PKCε (1:1,000) and myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS) (1:1,000), to PKCε (1:1,000), ERK1/2 (1:2,000), and to activator protein 1 (AP-1) (1:1,000) from Santa Cruz, to cAMP responsive element binding protein 1(CREB1) (1:1,000) from Millipore; mouse monoclonal antibodies to MARCKS (1:1,000) and phosho-ERK1/2 (1:2,000) from Santa Cruz, to p120GAP (1:2,000) from Upstate Biotechnology, to neo-epitope ARG on aggrecan, clone BC-3 (1:1,000 for Western blotting and 1:200 for immunocytochemistry) from ABCAM, and to β-tubulin (1:500) from Sigma; and secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase or fluorochromes from Santa Cruz.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Activation Assay, Expressing, Immunodetection

    Genomic pairwise sequence alignments which correspond to the region that spans 1500bp upstream of the human transcription start site of ACAN and ADAMTS5, or the intergenic region (1375bp) between hsa-mir-377 and its 5’ adjacent hsa-mir-496 were used to identify potential AP1 (red) and CREB1 (green) transcription binding sites. Comparative analysis with four other animal species, namely Oryctolagus cuniculus-rabbit, Rattus norvegicus-rat, Canis familiaris-dog, and Bos taurus-cow that are commonly used for IVD studies, revealed that the ACAN and ADAMTS5 promoters in Homo sapiens are less responsive to AP-1 and CREB activation than the bovine ones, in contrast to the hsa-mir-377 promoter which is enriched in these sites and thus expected to yield higher stoichiometry responses (“--” indicate non available alignments).

    Journal: PLoS ONE

    Article Title: PKCε Signalling Activates ERK1/2, and Regulates Aggrecan, ADAMTS5, and miR377 Gene Expression in Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082045

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Genomic pairwise sequence alignments which correspond to the region that spans 1500bp upstream of the human transcription start site of ACAN and ADAMTS5, or the intergenic region (1375bp) between hsa-mir-377 and its 5’ adjacent hsa-mir-496 were used to identify potential AP1 (red) and CREB1 (green) transcription binding sites. Comparative analysis with four other animal species, namely Oryctolagus cuniculus-rabbit, Rattus norvegicus-rat, Canis familiaris-dog, and Bos taurus-cow that are commonly used for IVD studies, revealed that the ACAN and ADAMTS5 promoters in Homo sapiens are less responsive to AP-1 and CREB activation than the bovine ones, in contrast to the hsa-mir-377 promoter which is enriched in these sites and thus expected to yield higher stoichiometry responses (“--” indicate non available alignments).

    Article Snippet: We used the following antibodies (and dilutions): polyclonal antibodies to tropomyocin (1:400) from Sigma, to phosphorylated species of PKCε (1:1,000) and myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS) (1:1,000), to PKCε (1:1,000), ERK1/2 (1:2,000), and to activator protein 1 (AP-1) (1:1,000) from Santa Cruz, to cAMP responsive element binding protein 1(CREB1) (1:1,000) from Millipore; mouse monoclonal antibodies to MARCKS (1:1,000) and phosho-ERK1/2 (1:2,000) from Santa Cruz, to p120GAP (1:2,000) from Upstate Biotechnology, to neo-epitope ARG on aggrecan, clone BC-3 (1:1,000 for Western blotting and 1:200 for immunocytochemistry) from ABCAM, and to β-tubulin (1:500) from Sigma; and secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase or fluorochromes from Santa Cruz.

    Techniques: Sequencing, Binding Assay, Activation Assay